jump to navigation

Watford 1 West Ham United 1 (25/02/2017) 26/02/2017

Posted by Matt Rowson in Match reports.

1- After a two week break, and notwithstanding a defeat at Old Trafford that was disappointing but far from humiliating, perspective on games like this has changed.  The two wins against Arsenal and Burnley reversed the gentle downwards slide and we are now by general consensus a Mid Table Club… not that relegation is impossible, but we’d have to work pretty hard to achieve it. There have been signs of life at a number of clubs down the bottom – Swansea and Hull in particular – but we’re still ten points clear of the relegation zone.  You don’t have to be great to avoid relegation, you just have to be less bad than at least three other teams and we’re certainly that.


West Ham are similarly comfortably irrelevant in mid-table and so this threatened to be an open game with neither side overly under pressure.  This suggestion was re-enforced by Walter Mazzarri’s team selection which featured Janmaat and Holebas, neither of whom the most cautious of full-backs, in a back four with Niang and Zárate flanking Troy up front.

2- Our start did little to contradict this suggestion; we flew at the Hammers from the off, and within a couple of minutes Tom Cleverley and Troy had combined to release the vivacious Zárate in the box.  He got what looked like a panicky shove in the back from Kouyaté and won the penalty.  Troy is such a cool bastard in these situations… how wonderful to be pondering how he’s going to score rather than not being able to watch… this time a perfectly placed finish low inside the post and beyond the dive of Darren Randolph.

The warm-up had involved an exercise that saw our midfielders and forwards practising first-time shots from distance, whether reflecting the wet conditions, the way they expected the game to pan out or reservations about the Hammers’ keeper Darren Randolph.  As an aside, Mauro Zárate excelled at this for all his moderate goalscoring record… whilst Daryl Janmaat’s venomous lack of precision necessitated attention from all parents in the lower inter-quartile range of the Rookery.  This ambition was visible for the opening fifteen minutes or so also… the “one shot on target” stat isn’t great, but is slightly misleading.  Niang’s violent drive was the most eye-catching, narrowly clearing the Hammers’ crossbar and presumably causing damage to whatever or whoever halted its progress in the Vicarage Road end, whilst Zárate’s curling effort looked on its way in before being sent unfortunately wide by a deflection.

3- Gradually, however, we were realising that the game that had been suggested by our early breakthrough – you know, more goals’n’that – wasn’t what we were watching.  Key in this was that West Ham are a very good side – albeit a striker short of being a dangerous one.  Whilst we enjoyed the better chances of the half Snodgrass was enough of a threat to cause anxiety at the back, and at the other end our attacking options were gradually being negated.

Niang, in particular, put in his least convincing outing since his arrival;  this in part reflected the amount of attention he was being afforded… tightly marked, his impact was uncharacteristically limited and he lost his rag on more than one occasion, particularly in the second half.  Troy had a more successful afternoon but was nonetheless curtailed by the excellent Fonte, who was the match of much of what our increasingly limited attacking forays had to offer.

Our most potent threat had been Mauro Zárate, but having gone down badly once and apparently recovered he was spotted curled up in pain on the edge of our box as a West Ham attack was repelled, and after a prolonged spell of treatment involving oxygen masks and a large entourage of attendees he was stretchered off.  Between then and the break Daryl Janmaat went down too – like Zárate, the Dutchman attempted to continue but was withdrawn shortly into the second half.

4- And it was a second half that the Hammers dominated without ever really threatening to overwhelm the home side.  Niang was isolated against Kouyaté on the left of the box and was lucky not to concede a penalty.  The Frenchman was now on the Watford left, Doucouré nominally on the right but often dropping inside to stiffen a struggling midfield in which Behrami was in his element.  As a consequence Aaron Cresswell was often in miles of space on the left hand side and it was down this side that the equaliser finally came, Antonio charging down the flank, slinging in a shot that deliberated about going in but hit both posts before falling conveniently for Ayew to score.  They got the break with that rebound but given our own similar profit from a generous deflection at Arsenal, and the fact that we’d been under pressure for much of the half – Fonte had forced a fine save from Gomes, Antonio had shot narrowly wide – it would be churlish to grumble too much.

The injuries thing is a well-beaten drum but you can’t help but wonder with frustration what we might have achieved this season with a bit of a clearer run.  If in this game, for instance, we’d had Nordin Amrabat available to replace Zárate off the bench, or Roberto Pereyra in midfield for everything to flow through, we’d have been so much stronger.  Our brief resurgence at the end of the game had something to do with the Hammers going down to ten after Antonio racked up his second silly booking of the afternoon, but also to do with the eight minutes afforded to Isaac Success which afforded us precious little time to enjoy his disruptive randomness.  Aggravating that we’re not confident enough in his fitness to unleash him – he’s still only started the once.

5- So the game ended with a goalmouth scramble that I’d have been interested to dissect in more detail than Match of the Day permitted, but in any event a point was as much as we could possibly have laid claim to.  For all that the game slipped away from us we had enough about us to hang onto the point – kudos to the defending in the face of lots of zippy movement if no focal point.

On reflection I guess there’s a lot to be said for a “meh” game at this stage of the season.  Not terrible, never less than interesting and a perpetually bubbling-under narkiness that held your attention.  But not gripping, and but for a point that has us creeping towards confirmation of safety largely irrelevant.  This is the grey area of irrelevance in the Premier League between the teams that might win something and the relegation scrap.  Fulham and Charlton have both taken root in the shadows here in years past and being here makes you realise that it’s only dull from the outside looking in.  Being here – not least with a side that’s capable of fine things on a good day (or given a clean bill of health) – is a very fine thing for a side like ours.  For the moment.




1. David Allen - 26/02/2017

As usual a well-balanced and well-thought out analysis.
Regarding your speculations over injuries, in my long, long experience football is always a game about “if-only”s and our lack of fit players falls into just that category. It’s interesting to opine thus, but in the end it is what it is and there aint no changing the situation.

2. Adam Segal - 26/02/2017

Matt, I thought the game was quite poor as were we in the second half. West Ham had 68% possession and we really struggled to keep he ball
or string successive passes together without losing it. Capoue was fairly absent again and losing Zarate was very unfortunate. I hope we are not in for more serious injuries to disrupt our final 10 or 11 games. I think you are correct in that we should be safe but I still feel uneasy. Hopefully we can grab a few wins off the lower placed teams and see out the season comfortably, but where to from here? We haven’t really improved on last season and my feeling is that a few players will be moved on next year most notably Watson, Cathcart and I also think Doucore. There are others too like dejede and arlauksis (pardon my spelling) but they would be expected. Next year will be interesting as expectation will be fairly or unfairly increased.

3. Roger Smith - 26/02/2017

Their goal was scored whilst the crowd were celebrating Graham Taylor’s achievement at the club, and Walter put it down to a lack of concentration.

Without in any way seeking to detract from GT’s memory, I wonder how distracting “There’s only one Graham Taylor!” is for the players.

Matt Rowson - 26/02/2017

Comes to something if our players’ concentration is upset by us making a noise… insert punchline here…

4. Robert Hill - 26/02/2017

Our main problem has been relevant for a while now. Fact is under pressure we cannot keep the ball at all well at this level. We panic on the ball’, make bad decisions and then wonder why we are once again chasing the ball. If I was a gruntled Hammer fan I would have been angry that with so much more quality in possession, pace and movement then I would be angry at only getting a draw. Without doubt our squad is stronger but still we don’t look comfortable, and just cannot extend our advantage to a more comfortable feeling. But I just can’t put my finger on why? I’m not a fan of the system we are playing and are not in my opinion getting the best from Niang by playing him wide. I wonder what he could achieve through the middle alongside Deeney. We get in front and then fall away instead of stamping authority on the game. Is Mazzarri getting the best from the players? Have we got the system right with the players we have? Without at anytime having huge expectation (I’ve been around too long) I think we are making much harder work than is necessary. Shame about Zarate just as he is settling in. This season has had more ups and downs and less consistency for some while, but I sense we could be doing much better. Is it the players who’s freedom seem to have been stamped on or are we just not good enough at times? I must say Kaboul was outstanding and for me were a little better also with Cathcart on even though he is playing out of position. The inconsistency at the moment is so frustrating.

5. MartinG - 27/02/2017

I agree with Robert and the inconsistency point. Since the start of 2016 there has been a lot of turgid football interleaved with a better performance every few games. How many times have you been on the edge of your seat due to our slick interplay and bombarding of the opposition goal, or even having a shot at all?

If Capoue is in languid mode, which seems to be much of the time, then there’s little drive through from midfield. And the approach one of containment. We appear to be treading water, and it’s generally not a good watch. But I guess given that the key ambition is to stay reaping Premiership riches, and who can carp at the improvements to the club infrastructure and the stability brought by the Pozzos after the shambles of previous regimes, we may have to get used to it being that way (though I’m not convinced we are out of the relegation scrap yet). Generally dull with the odd gem thrown in now and again.

6. harefield hornet - 01/03/2017

Oh the price of success! No pun intended. We now have to watch boring Premier League mid-table stuff instead of Championship relegation scraps! The indignity of it all!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: