Watford 0 Derby County 1 (12/12/2009) 13/12/2009
Posted by Ian Grant in Match reports.35 comments
1. Hang on, haven’t we already played these? For reasons best known to themselves, Derby decided to turn up in fancy dress: “Sorry, Nige, I’m right aht of Brazil 1970 and England 1966,” said the man in the costume shop. “Forest’s European Cup winning team, y’say? Well, I could order it for ya. Tell ya what I ‘ave got: Coventry City 1989. It’s on special offer.”
With a line-up featuring Robbie Savage, Lee Hendrie and Paul Dickov – a Sports Personality of the Year shortlist in an alternate, much more tetchy universe, possibly one in which Craig Bellamy is prime minister – and a formation built from concrete and asbestos, it’s actually quite hard to believe that we didn’t lose to Coventry yesterday. Derby are dreary, ugly industry in an old Coventry kit. But we’d do well to remember our ambitions weren’t exactly sky-high in August either.
2. As churlish as it always seems to whine about the referee after a defeat, an already cold, dull afternoon wasn’t exactly improved by Mr K Stroud. One of those officials who sets daft precedents: a couple of innocuous fouls early on requiring him to blow his whistle for every bit of physical contact thereafter; an early booking for Jon Harley when a lecture would’ve sufficed, leading to a rash of yellow cards for nothings and somethings alike. The inevitable result is that the rest of the ninety minutes turns into an administrative chore, like spending two hours in the spectators’ gallery of a magistrate’s court in a rural village.
3. So, anyway, let’s not put it off any longer: Derby completely out-witted us. As tempting as it always is to blame our own failings – of which there were some, but probably no more than on several occasions when we’ve emerged with beaming smiles – the match was mainly about the little bit of turf in front of their back four. There, Robbie Savage was nailed to a post like a scarecrow, barely moving more than twenty yards during the entire game; he did exactly the same job, and to the same effect, as John Eustace on his debut against Wolves a couple of years ago.
Aware that most of our attacking interchanges – the sly balls into Danny Graham, the bursts from Tom Cleverley, the cross-field switching of Don Cowie – take place in that area, Derby simply occupied that crucial space from first to last and effectively eliminated the threat of all three in the process. Add some tight pressing in other areas – particularly out wide, where, with Cleverley placed elsewhere, we lack anyone who’ll take on and beat an opponent – and you’ve got a perfect recipe for containment. We were trying to play expansive football in a broom cupboard. A rite of passage for a young side, in many ways; challenges they won’t have faced before.
4. And for a young manager too. Because in a game that always looked like to be settled by a set piece, there was no obvious change to be made: the most keenly-felt absence was that of Henri Lansbury, someone to provide the option of an extra body in midfield, an occasional unexpected charge forward, and a bit more height at corners and free kicks. Needing to bypass a midfield that we couldn’t play through, we found ourselves in a contest that played to very few of our strengths; even then, even as the defeat seemed utterly inevitable, a couple of the hopeful lobs towards the penalty area nearly fell for us late on. A game of small margins.
5. Let’s not be downhearted, then. A season ticket to Vicarage Road has thus far offered quite fantastic entertainment, even allowing for intermittent reminders that we’re not the finished product. And that there will never be a finished product, given that we’ve borrowed several cups of sugar from the neighbours. This, on the other hand, was cold and brutal, a dry Ryvita after we’ve got used to buttered crumpets with raspberry jam. It was a defeat born of our opponents’ pragmatism, their clinical and cynical determination to prevent us from doing what we do best; that’s to their credit, much as it was also to our immense frustration.
But there’s a healthy pragmatism in our dressing room too, it seems to me. Without any pompous pronouncements about how football should be played, we’ve attacked with dazzling, inspiring, thrilling verve much of the time; it’s hard to recall a Watford side capable of quite so much excitement without invoking Graham Taylor’s name. The previous manager’s dogmatism has fallen away: the point is that we’re playing like this because there are enough teams in the division who won’t get tight enough, who won’t have Robbie Savage patrolling that bit of space, who won’t concentrate all of their energy on denying us any room in the final third. It’s our best bet, with what we have available. It’s got us to tenth at Christmas-ish, which is not far short of a miracle. We just have to persevere, nothing else for it.
Watford 3 Queens Park Rangers 1 (07/12/2009) 08/12/2009
Posted by Matt Rowson in Match reports.31 comments
Five thunks from the evening the earth stopped turning.
1- There’s only one place to start. Time stands still. The rain falls upwards. Lloyd’s goal was just a marvellous, beautiful moment; like much of the Rookery, I had imagined Ellington turning around and celebrating. Identifying Lloydy’s frantic, helpless ecstasy elevated celebrations to a whole new level. How to do the event justice? Well we had a good go… the atmosphere had been flat as our bluntness, shorn of H and Lansbury, saw us struggle to make much of our superior possession. After the moment? Pure joy. Not (much) triumphalism, just a thoroughly happy, bouncing crowd, as if we’d all just shared some kind of epiphany. And the mood was shared on the pitch, as our game took on a joyous bounce. The only slight disappointment was that Messenger was driving, and had hence foregone the option of going to the bar before half time…
2- QPR look a state, particularly in front of goal… but this was still a gutsy, unlikely win. Any number of previous vintages of Watford team would have crumbled in the face of Patrick Agyemang’s goal (and it’s peculiarly solemn celebration); the Lloydy goal defined the match, perhaps we wouldn’t have won the game without such a momentous turn of events (our movement and composure went to pot for five or ten minutes before the equaliser). But whatever the circumstances we came from behind two days after defeat in Newcastle against a side with an extraordinarily star-studded bench. Big grins in Hertfordshire.
3- Liam Henderson. For the first time, we get it. Some great touches and contributions from the young striker who, as my brother observed, has shoulders that begin around his ears. His lack of pace is likely to limit how he can be employed, but there’s something there to work with OK.
4- Fitz Hall. So very nearly three red cards in his last four visits (which also saw the play-off scrap with Boothroyd). Damion Stewart could also have gone as Rangers lost their composure.
5- Some tremendous performances all over the pitch. Great to see Demerit’s decisiveness back in the side, even if he looks a strong candidate to depart in January. Lee Hodson is just wonderful. Don Cowie improves with every game. Lloydinho’s performance was magnificent even if one (ha ha) discounts the goal. And Tom Cleverley, in a central role that might have challenged him, looked tidy, quick, clever, tenacious. What a player this lad is going to be.
Watford 3 Scunthorpe United 0 (21/09/2009) 22/11/2009
Posted by Matt Rowson in Match reports.33 comments
Five thunks from a comprehensive victory over Scunny…
1- The more this goes on, the greater is the credence to the argument that we’re not playing a succession of bad teams at home… we’re making teams look bad. Our midfield was again phenomenal, Lansbury and Cowie in particular standing out, and that movement and ball retention is going to expose plenty of teams, even those that haven’t had to cope with an early morning hotel fire alarm like Scunny. It could have been six.
2- With half an eye on the recent trip to West Brom, Palace and Newcastle could both be interesting. Scunny tried to bully us in the first half, indulged by a refereeing performance that reached extraordinary levels of preposterousness after the break, and more experienced, more solid teams will do so better. How we cope with Warnock’s trolls and mutants will be informative.
3- No weak performances today. Not one. And Lee Hodson is just bloody ace.
4- It really nearly happened again, didn’t it? And this would have been a beautiful moment for Lloydy to open his account, what with Grant absent at a photography course (I ask you!) and Messenger having already departed for his half-time pint. I do hope it happens when Messenger’s at the bar…
5- Scunny do seem to like their gobby little strikers. A visit to Glanford Park a few years ago was dominated by Martin Patterson (now Burnley) mouthing off incessantly, this time it was Gary Hooper. Like Patterson, a decent looking striker, but he didn’t half go on… Scunny looked tidy in the final third, but it wasn’t nearly enough.
Book Signing…. 17/11/2009
Posted by Matt Rowson in Thoughts about things.7 comments
If you’ve ever visited this blog before you’ll probably be painfully aware that I’ve recently had a book published on the history of the club, “Watford FC On This Day”.
This coming Thursday (Nov 19th) from 6pm to 8pm I’ll be signing copies at Waterstones in the Harlequin. Perhaps more enticingly, Watford manager Malky Mackay and legend Nigel Gibbs will also be present signing copies.
It would be good to see you there.
That is all.
Watford 2 Preston North End 0 (07/11/2009) 09/11/2009
Posted by Matt Rowson in Thoughts about things.43 comments
Five thunks from another fine home victory.
1- It’s a long time since we’ve been as utterly on top as we were in that first half. Glorious stuff it was, too, verve and movement that was in part responsible for Preston standing around looking very stupid for much of the time. The slight concern, of course, was that 2-0 didn’t remotely capture the degree of our domination but we were never in trouble.
2- Cherry on the icing on the cake was that magnificent second goal, for which there are scarcely sufficient superlatives. Lansbury’s second consecutive fine home performance adds credence to his argument that centre midfield – rather than “in the hole” is where he’s best employed. There was more than a hint of Steven Gerrard in his run for the second goal, powering through challenges, retaining sufficient composure to pick the perfect pass as Graham and Helguson distracted around him.
3- My word weren’t Preston, to a surprising degree, a pile of lumpy awfulness though? From the first minute where Preston’s defence watched a cross float to the far post with the immobile, distracted air of kids at a firework display it was evident that fun could be had. And yes, DM, I’m concious that we played a very great part in making them look lumpy but lumpy they very much were. Worst of a poor bunch was full-back Michael Hart whose display reached comical levels of incompetence; it’s difficult to conceive how a team in the top half of the division is capable of defending that badly (what? oh yes…)
4- And, to state the bleeding obvious, surely the most unit weight per striekr of any side in the division in Parkin, Mellor and Brown. Only Stephen Elliott, so frequently a scorer against the Hornets, came off the bench to challenge the average.
5- This is all rather fun, isn’t it?
Watford 4 Sheffield Wednesday 1 (23/10/2009) 24/10/2009
Posted by Matt Rowson in Match reports.22 comments
Five Thunks from a fun-packed evening at Vicarage Road.
1- Well I have to confess to not having seen that coming. The continuing absence of H and the Duke still on the bench didn’t particularly lift the spirits on the way into the ground either. It’s never as much fun as when you don’t expect it, is it…?
2- Speaking of which, Angela’s performance had not been suggested by his previous outings. Strong, confident, elegant, direct, and utterly unplayable. More please.
3- Having said all of which, Wednesday were pretty shocking. They were ropier than us defensively, and whilst Tudgay looked sharp there was next to nothing going on around him. And quite what Michael Gray, the most left-footed player ever, was doing on the right flank is beyond me.
4- And not wishing to focus unduly on the negative, but Scotty really does need to start coming for things and knocking opponents out of the way whilst doing so. It’s not as if his centre-backs are really big enough to do the job for him…
5- Having, whilst hanging the washing, frequently overheard two of my younger neighbours debating the various merits of the big four ad infinitum whilst kicking a ball around, I took the bold step of inviting the pair, both nine years old, to watch, you know, a proper football match, in the stadium and everything. The morning after, both are gushing about the experience and Josh is wearing a brand new replica shirt. My work here is done… (with a bit of help from Angela, Danny, Tom et al).
Terry Challis 07/10/2009
Posted by Ian Grant in Thoughts about things.15 comments
For those of a certain vintage – well, quite a number of vintages – the cartoons of Terry Challis are as much a part of the identity of their own personal Watford as the memorabilia, the programme covers, the photographs that clouded around the football club to form something worth a special place in anyone’s heart.
You won’t need to have a Terry Challis cartoon in front of you to conjure up an image of that familiar style in your mind’s eye: the pithy, witty and often rather insightful commentary on the week’s events, followed by the inevitable highlighting of the last game’s star player, name embossed underneath. In days before blanket coverage and instant highlights, it always seemed particularly vital after a distant, unseen away game, as much a part of the reportage as Oliver Phillips’ account alongside.
If the Watford Observer was essential reading for so many years, it was because there was an ethos behind it all. A commitment to quality, a strongly-opinionated but essentially constructive outlook, a sense of personality behind the names. It was an ethos that echoed the club in good times, but put it into rather awkward relief when standards at Vicarage Road slipped.
For me, Terry Challis’ name will always ring loudest in the largely barren nineties. It was one of the times when Watford Football Club most needed some wry commentary…but also when it needed the essentially positive tint he applied with great subtlety to his work, even at the gloomiest of times. It needed that ethos, an ethos that he so helped to shape and represent.
There’ll be many others with much more personal memories of the man behind the pen. But I can recall being among the editors of the You Are My Watford book, raising money for the Supporters Trust in past times of need. Along with lots of others, we asked Terry Challis for a contribution, hoping perhaps for a drawing or two that might enliven a couple of pages. Instead, we received an original two-page cartoon covering the entire history of the club in typically charming style. As one of my co-editors said, “He’s done us proud.”
Yeah, well. He did Watford proud. Thanks, Terry.
Terry Challis’ cartoon from the You Are My Watford book. Click on the thumbnails to enlarge. Enjoy.
Watford 0 Cardiff City 4 (03/10/2009) 04/10/2009
Posted by Matt Rowson in Match reports.29 comments
Five thunks from the horror show at the Vic
1- Well where to start, really. Defensively, a side that was holding it together quite convincingly earlier in the campaign really isn’t doing so at all now, and that goes for the entire team, not just the back five. We could really do with a gnarled old boot like Mackay or Dyche (of five or so years ago…) in there shouting at people… since the back four are individually more than adequate, but about as watertight as, well, something with ruddy great big holes all over it at the moment.
2- Cathcart in particular, had a horror show – his stupid and utterly unnecessary tug on Bothroyd, who was heading towards the corner flag and would have managed an off-balance shot at an impossible angle at best, resulted from Cathcart losing his concentration and his man again, just as against Leicester. He failed to cope with the unlovable Bothroyd throughout, and isn’t inspiring confidence at the moment. Reports from Plymouth suggest that this is a cracking defender in the making but perhaps he needs a dominant figure alongside him. Unfortunately the same goes for most of our centre-backs, including our visually impaired absent captain.
3- Two weeks’ respite might give us room to wallow in our miserableness, we could certainly have done with something from the home games this week, but it might also herald Helguson’s return. Danny Graham, suddenly looking far from confident in front of goal, could do with that boost. No pressure again then, H.
4- Would welcome readers’ views on Hoskins… my view from the Rookery was that he’d done well enough to last an hour without contributing an awful lot, and was certainly adding nothing by the time he came off. My brother’s Upper Rous view sparked a furious defence, he should never have been taken off, had a great first half, everyone mistakes his good bits for Cleverley (possibly true). My feeling remains that whilst Ellington will not (one hopes, for the sake of our wagebill) be a long-term solution, using a hungry and effective (if over-eager) player as cover for Helguson makes rather more sense than persevering with the ineffective Hoskins.
5- It’s odd… logically, after a game in which the difference between the sides was far larger than any margin that might be attributed to erroneous refereeing decisions, one ought to be able to sit back and marvel at a particularly spectacular demonstration of how not to referee a football match without getting bloody angry about it. Alas, I am unable so to do. Andy Woolmer missed two clear penalties (one for each side), was constantly behind the play, was horrifically inconsistent in what he chose to penalise and has seemingly never heard of “playing an advantage”. After a similarly chaotic visit to Vicarage Road for the Sheffield Wednesday game last season, Mr.Woolmer’s name becomes one to look out for.
I’ve got your number… 30/09/2009
Posted by Matt Rowson in Thoughts about things.10 comments
Right then. Answers to the quiz. Disappointed in the quite pathetic number of people prepared to have a guess… we had three completely correct responses from John Slaytor, Trefor Jones and Avi Govind. At least one of you already has the book… if the other two want a copy, mail/comment me your details. Big respec’ to Mike Peter, as ever, for at least having a punt.
q1a – which is the largest squad number to have been used by Watford?
41. Yves Makaba-Makalamby had no 50 when on loan from Chelsea a few seasons ago, but never made it onto the pitch.
q1b – Which two players have worn this number
Yohann Cavalli in 2006/07 and Lee Hodson last season.
q2 – Which player has made the most appearances for Watford over this period.
Tommy Smith is the answer to this one with 285, some forty clear of Lloyd Doyley (245), who would have been my guess, followed by Neil Cox (242).
q3 – Three players have worn four different squad numbers. Name them.
This is the one that provoked most accusation, discussion and hassle over email and at Cov last night. The answer is Tommy Smith (17 from 1999-01, 9 from 2001-03, 29 in 2006-07 and 21 from 2007-09), Neil Cox (36 in 1999-00, 2 in 2000-01, 29 in 2001-02 and 5 from 2002-05) and Anthony McNamee (33 in 2001-02, 16 from 2002-04, 23 in 2004-05 and 19 from 2005-08)
q4a – Which player appeared in the same shirt number in the largest number of seasons?
Alec Chamberlain – easy points here, surely?
q4b – Which shirt number did he wear?
no. 1
q4c – How many seasons did he wear it for?
Seven – from 1999-01 and from 2002-07, Espen Baardsen usurping for one season
Which two players tie for second place in this regard?
Micah Hyde and Heidar Helguson, with five seasons each at nos. 8 and 18 respectively. Jay Demerit, Richard Lee and Lloyd Doyley record their fifth seasons in their current shirt this season.
q5a- Which player has played the most games in one shirt number?
q5b – Which shirt number?
Micah Hyde again, with 187 in the no 8 shirt. Heidar in second with 177 at 18, Lloyd in third with 157 at 12.
q6- Which shirt number has been used in the largest number of games?
no 8, with three steadyish incumbents in Hyde, Mahon and Eustace. Shirts 9, 5 and 4 each some 40 apps behind.
q7a- Which two shirts have had the largest number of incumbents?
Another hotly debated topic. Yes, OK Walker, 7 is one of them, 33 the other.
q7b- How many incumbents has each of these shirts had?
Nine each. Wearers of no 7 are (in chronological order) Michel Ngonge, Carlton Palmer, Allan Nielsen, Bruce Dyer, Carl Fletcher, Chris Eagles, Damien Francis, Liam Bridcutt, and Don Cowie. Wearers of no 33: Dominic Foley, Fabien Forde, Anthony McNamee, Scott Fitzgerald, Dominic Blizzard, Junior Osborne, Trevor Benjamin, Jordan Parkes and Liam Henderson. None of the wearers of 33 have worn it for more than one season, and it has of course its tenth incumbent this season in Lee Hodson.
q7c- How many shirt numbers have been sported by one player only?
None.
8a- Which shirt number is the most cherished, in that the average number of appearances per incumbent is the largest?
That would be no 8 again, by some distance, with its three incumbents (see above) averaging 123.3 apps each. No 18, averaging 68.5 apps, and no 3, 64.4, some way behind.
8b- And which shirt number has been worn only once by each of its incumbents?
The number 40, worn once each by Theo Robinson against Newcastle at the end of 2006-07, and Andrei Stepanov in his record brief Watford career vs Southampton ast season.
The answer to the tie-breaker, in how many of the 508 competitive games that we’ve played over these ten seasons was the most used shirt employed, is 370.
Watford 2 Coventry City 3 (29/09/2009) 30/09/2009
Posted by Matt Rowson in Thoughts about things.7 comments
Five thunks from the chaos against Cov…
1- This was, of course, what we were always at risk of with our thin and inexperienced squad. The continued absences of Helguson, Demerit and (effectively) Severin deprive us of experience where we have little to spare; the additional absences of Ellington, Jenkins, Cathcart and (ultimately) Hodson left us looking very sparse indeed. But it’s lack of nous that’s the issue really… there’s no way that points should have been dropped from half time onwards against a lamentable Coventry City side.
2- In particular that centre-back pairing of Wright and Ward was something else. A less mobile defensive partnership hasn’t been witnessed at Vicarage Road since Merthyr Town fielded a wood stove and a wardrobe at the back in 1928. That said, Leon Best’s equalising goal was slapstick stuff. A quite astonishing number of yellow shirts standing around watching… both sides had horrible nights at the back, Coventry’s win ultimately accidental.
3- An interesting test of Danny Graham’s mettle coming up, as he experienced his first bad night at Watford. We could probably do with something going in off his backside against Cardiff, thanks to the international break it’ll be a long wait before his next chance to get over yesterday evening.
4- Graham wasn’t the only one to miss chances… Will Hoskins’ slightly unfortunate miss in the opening minute nonetheless defied belief, whilst Liam Henderson’s late miss was another costly error. Kieran Westwood meanwhile was undoubtedly the man of the match… the two first half saves denying Graham’s breakaway and later Hoskins’ flicked backheel were something else.
5- Can those booing the attempts at short corners explain themselves please? Once again we started with no six footers outfield last night against a goalkeeper confidently taking everything (see 4) and a defence that wasn’t much cop at anything beyond occupying space (see 2), lumping it into the box wasn’t likely to be a fruitful option was it?

